Our most highly cited papers from 2017


Citation of papers is an important statistic for any journal. Citations are the basis for the journal impact factors and give us the best indicator of the extent to which the work we publish is being picked up by other researchers in the field. For most papers it takes a while to attract citations. Some never do and sink into obscurity. Some start of slowly but attract attention as time goes by (a slow but steady burn). What the journals really like to see are the papers that explode onto the scene and attract attention immediately.

The list below shows the papers published in 2017 that have attracted the most citations.

Vitamin D supplementation and its influence on muscle strength and mobility in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rosendahl-Rise et al
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and their treating clinicians have different views regarding diet. Holt et al
How much is 5-a-day’? A qualitative investigation into consumer understanding of fruit and vegetable intake guidelines. Rooney et al
Is there an association between dietary intake and academic achievement: a systematic review. Burrows et al
Adding glucose to food and solutions to enhance fructose absorption is not effective in preventing fructose-induced functional gastrointestinal symptoms: randomised controlled trials in patients with fructose malabsorption. Tuck et al
Growth status of children with autism spectrum disorder: a case-control study. Barnhill et al
Evaluation of the quality and health literacy demand of online renal diet information. Lambert et al
Food-based anthocyanin intake and cognitive outcomes in human intervention trials: a systematic review. Kent et al
Vegetarianism and breast, colorectal and prostate cancer risk: an overview and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Godos et al
Adherence to the Healthy Eating Index and Alternative Healthy Eating Index dietary patterns and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Onvani et al

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s